A Disputed Domain Name and a Panel’s Decision

In the world of online domains and trademarks, disputes often arise that can have far-reaching consequences for businesses and individuals alike. In a recent case, the French bank specializing in consumer credit and electronic payments, Smartney, found itself in a dispute over the domain name <>. This dispute ultimately led to a panel’s decision that could set a precedent for similar cases in the future.


Smartney, a renowned French bank, established its subsidiary, Smartney, in 2018. This subsidiary offered customers innovative and favorable loan options using cutting-edge technology. Smartney had secured various domain names, including <>, and had obtained trademark registrations for “SMARTNEY.” However, in November 2022, an individual registered the domain name <> and put it up for sale. This prompted Smartney to take action, resulting in a dispute resolution process.

Key Facts:

  1. Smartney, a French bank, owns several SMARTNEY trademark registrations.
  2. The disputed domain name, <>, was registered in November 2022.
  3. The domain currently redirects to a sale page.
  4. The Respondent initially offered to sell the domain to Smartney.
  5. A preliminary suspension request was made but ultimately rejected.

Panel’s Decision:

The panelist overseeing this case was Mr. Piotr Nowaczyk. After careful consideration of the facts, he reached the following conclusions:

  • The Respondent did not use the domain for legitimate purposes and offered it for sale.
  • While reselling domain names is not necessarily evidence of bad faith, several factors indicated otherwise in this case.
  • The Domain Name wholly incorporated Smartney’s trademark.
  • The Respondent failed to provide a credible rationale for registering the domain.


In the rapidly evolving world of online domains and trademarks, the case of <> provides valuable insights. The panel’s decision highlights the importance of legitimate use and registration of domain names. It clarifies that reselling domain names, in itself, is not evidence of bad faith. However, when combined with other factors, such as using a trademarked name and failing to provide a credible rationale, it can lead to a determination of bad faith.

This case underscores the significance of protecting intellectual property in the digital age and the potential consequences of failing to do so. It serves as a reminder for businesses to be vigilant in safeguarding their online presence and trademarks. In the end, the decision in the Smartney case sets a precedent that may influence future domain disputes, emphasizing the importance of fair and ethical practices in the online world.


Join the Discussion

Discover more from Domain Magazine

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Verified by ExactMetrics