Red Bull Wrestles for her .io Domain

In a fascinating case involving one of the world’s most iconic energy drinks, Red Bull, and an intriguing domain dispute, the battle for unfolds. Red Bull, known for its energy-boosting beverages, made its way into the world of cryptocurrency and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). However, an individual registered the domain, leading to a compelling legal showdown.


Red Bull, the Austrian powerhouse behind the famous energy drink, has been quenching people’s thirst for energy since 1987. With global sales soaring to a staggering 11.6 billion units in 2022, Red Bull is available in 174 countries worldwide. Not only does it dominate the energy drink market, but Red Bull has also ventured into the world of non-fungible tokens (NFTs), offering unique digital assets for sale.

Key Facts:

  1. Red Bull, founded in Austria, started its international journey in 1992, making it a global energy drink giant.
  2. The brand boasts numerous registered trademarks, including the iconic RED BULL name and logo.
  3. The disputed domain,, was registered on August 9, 2021.
  4. Initially, the domain resolved to a website related to “Redbul” cryptocurrency.
  5. The respondent failed to respond to the complaint, leaving room for speculation.

Panel’s Decision:

Mr. Ian Lowe, the panelist presiding over the case, delved into the details. He found that the respondent had not used the domain for legitimate purposes but rather attempted to mimic Red Bull’s branding and attract users to purchase and sell cryptocurrency.

The use of a slight misspelling of the word “Bull,” along with a logo resembling Red Bull’s, strongly suggested an attempt to confuse internet users. The inconsistent contact details on the website added to the suspicion.

While the bull is often associated with bullish trends in financial markets, the use of the color red typically signals caution. The respondent provided no explanation for this choice, further raising eyebrows. Mr. Lowe believed the respondent had the Complainant, Red Bull, in mind when registering the domain.

In summary, the panel concluded that the respondent had registered and used the domain in bad faith to deceive internet users into believing it was affiliated with Red Bull for potential commercial gain. This constituted bad faith both in registration and use.


The battle for the domain highlights the importance of protecting established trademarks and brands in the digital age. Red Bull’s worldwide recognition and recent foray into NFTs made it a prime target for infringement. This case serves as a reminder that even the most well-known brands must remain vigilant in safeguarding their online presence.

In the end, the decision favored Red Bull, emphasizing the need to respect intellectual property rights and act in good faith in the realm of online domains. This case stands as a precedent for protecting brands in an ever-evolving digital landscape.



  1. Zoe Martin Avatar
    Zoe Martin

    The battle for showcased the crucial need to protect established trademarks and brands in the digital age. Red Bull, a globally recognized brand, faced infringement due to its NFT ventures. The resolution favored Red Bull, stressing the importance of respecting intellectual property rights and acting in good faith online. This case sets a precedent for brand protection in the rapidly changing digital landscape.

Join the Discussion

Discover more from Domain Magazine

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Verified by ExactMetrics